
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅4.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $612 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 220W vs 140W.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅4.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 220W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌122.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅4.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $612 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅4.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 220W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 220W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌122.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RTX A4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A4000 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A4000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX A4000's 19,463 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 13.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 (RTX A4000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+14% | 19,463 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 6144+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+6% | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+11% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 6 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 48+4% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 192+4% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 44.4% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 140W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 139.0+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 55.1% less ($612 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 153.7% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-55% | $1111 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+154% | 17.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












