
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX A5500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+29.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.
RTX A5500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅26.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,120 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX A5500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅+29.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅26.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,120 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RTX A5500 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A5500 Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 80 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 578 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 90 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A5500 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile
The RTX A5500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,120 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX A5500 Mobile's 17,120 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 29.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX A5500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7,424 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 22.27 TFLOPS (RTX A5500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 58 (RTX A5500 Mobile) with 184 Tensor cores vs 232.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+30% | 17,120 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 7424+26% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 22.27 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+15% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 232+26% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7.3 MB+26% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 58+26% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 232+26% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5500 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A5500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A5500 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A5500 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX A5500 Mobile's 165W — a 28.6% difference. The RTX A5500 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (RTX A5500 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 165W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 103.8+3% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A5500 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GA103 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #63 | #110 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












