
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 220W vs 140W.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅20.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅52.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 184).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 220W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌300.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅20.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅52.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 184).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 220W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 220W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌300.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 19.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 184 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 26,498+20% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 8960+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2055 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 280+52% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 8.8 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 70+52% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 280+52% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 44.4% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 140W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 189.3+88% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 75% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 233.8% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-75% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+234% | 13.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GB203 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #63 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












