
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,066 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 787.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 600W, a 380W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 304mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 6000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅49.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅308.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 184).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1616.4% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 600W vs 220W.
- ❌25.6% longer card at 304mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,066 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 787.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 600W, a 380W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 304mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅49.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅308.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 184).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 6000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1616.4% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 600W vs 220W.
- ❌25.6% longer card at 304mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 955 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 790 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 283 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 948 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 701 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 930 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 827 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 440 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX PRO 6000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 93.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 42,899+93% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 24064+309% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+470% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2407 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 184 | 752+309% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 23.5 MB+305% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 128 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 188+309% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 752+309% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 114.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 960 GB/s+114% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 128 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 92.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-63% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 304mm |
| Height | 112mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+41% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 94.2% less ($8066 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 788% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-94% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+788% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | GB202 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #63 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












