
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+483% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 85.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
- ❌55.1% longer card at 242mm vs 156mm.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 242mm, a 86mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,803 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅+483% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 85.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 242mm, a 86mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
- ❌55.1% longer card at 242mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,803 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than T400 4GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T400 4GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and T400 4GB

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
T400 4GB
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the T400 4GB's 3,803 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 483%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+483% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+1756% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+21% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1426% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 4GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 152% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 156mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 126.8+26% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. The T400 4GB costs 68.1% less ($340 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 85.8% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $159-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+86% | 23.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU117 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













