
GeForce RTX 3070

TITAN RTX
GeForce RTX 3070 vs TITAN RTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs TITAN RTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs TITAN RTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+10.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 452.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅16.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅213% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 184).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,095 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs TITAN RTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 10.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 184 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+10% | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+28% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+25% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1770 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 288+57% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+29% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 72+57% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 576+213% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX carries 24 GB. TITAN RTX gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 50% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 384-bit on the TITAN RTX. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 672 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 24% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-21% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+40% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 was 80% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 455% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-80% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+455% | 8.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #91 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














