
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 290% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 290% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Titan X Pascal?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Titan X Pascal still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 154 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Titan X Pascal

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Titan X Pascal's 13,660 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 62.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+62% | 13,660 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+64% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+85% | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+13% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+346% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Titan X Pascal relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 7.1% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 480 GB/s+7% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+85% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 58.4% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 289.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-58% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+289% | 11.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #63 | #198 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












