
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

TITAN Xp
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅26.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 184.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅26.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 184.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than TITAN Xp?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN Xp still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 825 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and TITAN Xp

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the TITAN Xp's 18,752 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 18.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,840 (TITAN Xp). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+18% | 18,752 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+67% | 12.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+9% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+314% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The TITAN Xp relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN Xp has 12 GB. The TITAN Xp offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) — a 22.3% advantage for the TITAN Xp. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3 MB (TITAN Xp) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s+22% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.0 (TITAN Xp). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the TITAN Xp's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 600W (TITAN Xp). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+34% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the TITAN Xp launched at $1199. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 58.4% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 15.6 (TITAN Xp) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 184.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-58% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+185% | 15.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #63 | #87 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












