
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Radeon AI PRO R9700
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌53.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 450W vs 300W.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 450W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 and the Radeon AI PRO R9700 reaches 28,589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 336 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395+3% | 28,589 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+163% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2920 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 112 | 128+14% |
| TMUs | 336+31% | 256 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+31% | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+163% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 carries 32 GB. Radeon AI PRO R9700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon AI PRO R9700. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 40% difference. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 336mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 336mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 95.3+46% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti came in at $1999, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. On MSRP, Radeon AI PRO R9700 was 35% cheaper ($700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 49.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon AI PRO R9700 (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1299-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 22.0+50% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 48 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #19 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














