
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌100.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅0.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.3 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 31,285 — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX leads by 6.4%. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 336 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395 | 31,285+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+75% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS | 61.39 TFLOPS+53% |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2498 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 112 | 192+71% |
| TMUs | 336 | 384+14% |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+250% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84 | 96+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 24 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 960 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and 384-bit on the Radeon RX 7900 XTX.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+5% | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 23.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 336mm vs 287mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 355W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 800W-6% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 336mm | 287mm |
| Height | 140mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 68°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 88.1+35% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti came in at $1999, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7900 XTX was 50% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 112.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $999-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 31.3+113% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #19 | #12 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














