GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Very Large (Check Case) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,100 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 69% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 231.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+231.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($1,100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 336 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395+4% | 28,211 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+75% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+53% |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2495 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 112 | 192+71% |
| TMUs | 336 | 384+14% |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+250% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84 | 96+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 48 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+17% | 864 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 41.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 336mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 295W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 750W-12% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 336mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 95.6+46% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1100, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 and now averages $3500. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti costs 68.6% less ($2400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 229.6% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-50% | $3999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1100-69% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.7+230% | 8.1 |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #19 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900
