
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Radeon RX 6950 XT
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 6950 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 6950 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 6950 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅18.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌81.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,099 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 25.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ❌34.3% higher power demand at 450W vs 335W.
- ❌25.8% longer card at 336mm vs 267mm.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($1,099 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.5 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 335W instead of 450W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 336mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon RX 6950 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon RX 6950 XT
The Radeon RX 6950 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,076 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 and the Radeon RX 6950 XT reaches 28,076 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6950 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) with 336 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395+5% | 28,076 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+110% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS+68% | 23.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2324 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 112 | 128+14% |
| TMUs | 336+5% | 320 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+950% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+5% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6950 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6950 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT carries 16 GB. GeForce RTX 3090 Ti gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 6950 XT. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+75% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs RDNA 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode (Radeon RX 6950 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | RDNA 2 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | RDNA 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the Radeon RX 6950 XT's 335W — a 29.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6950 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 336mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 335W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 850W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 336mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 83°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 83.8+28% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti came in at $1999, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT launched at $1099. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6950 XT was 45% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 25.5 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — the Radeon RX 6950 XT offers 73.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1099-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 25.5+73% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #19 | #25 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














