
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅10.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅36.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 240).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (26,594 vs 31,578).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌87.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+18.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 122.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅36.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 240).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅+18.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 122.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (26,594 vs 31,578).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌87.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3090?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3090 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 765 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 609 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 534 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 18.7%. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 328 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594 | 31,578+19% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+37% | 7680 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2610 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 112+40% | 80 |
| TMUs | 328+37% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+37% | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+37% | 60 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+37% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 85.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+86% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 20.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 312mm vs 285mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 285W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 700W-7% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 312mm | 285mm |
| Height | 140mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 110.8+46% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 46.7% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 123.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $799-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.7 | 39.5+123% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












