GeForce RTX 3090 vs Radeon PRO W7800
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (32 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3090.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (312mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $900 versus $2,200 for the Radeon PRO W7800, it costs 59% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 139.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+139.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($900) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon PRO W7800
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 and the Radeon PRO W7800 reaches 27,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 328 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594 | 27,180+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+134% | 4480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS | 45.25 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2525 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 112 | 128+14% |
| TMUs | 328+17% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+415% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+17% | 70 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3090 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 62.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+63% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 29.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 312mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 260W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 312mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 104.5+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $900, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 and now averages $2200. The GeForce RTX 3090 costs 59.1% less ($1300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.5 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12.4 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 3090 offers 137.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W7800 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-40% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $900-59% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.5+138% | 12.4 |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon PRO W7800
