
GeForce RTX 3090 vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE

GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 3090 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (312mm) | Standard Size (276mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $540 versus $900 for the GeForce RTX 3090, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 70.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+70.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($900) | ✅More affordable ($540) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon RX 7900 GRE

GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,162 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 and the Radeon RX 7900 GRE reaches 27,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 80 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) with 328 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594 | 27,162+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+105% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2245 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 112 | 160+43% |
| TMUs | 328+3% | 320 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+312% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+3% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3090 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — a 62.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+63% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 7900 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 260W — a 29.5% difference. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 312mm vs 276mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 260W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 312mm | 276mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 60°C-29% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 104.5+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $900, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE launched at $549 and now averages $540. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE costs 40% less ($360 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.5 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 50.3 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the Radeon RX 7900 GRE offers 70.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $549-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $900 | $540-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.5 | 50.3+71% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #29 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














