
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅41.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 232).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$1,130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 150W.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $369 less on MSRP ($1,130 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 350W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅41.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 232).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $369 less on MSRP ($1,130 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 350W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$1,130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 better than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 722 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 634 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 765 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 609 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 534 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 163 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 versus the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile's 24,805 — the GeForce RTX 3090 leads by 7.2%. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2010 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 58 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) with 328 Tensor cores vs 232.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594+7% | 24,805 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+41% | 7424 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS+44% | 24.72 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2010 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 112+40% | 80 |
| TMUs | 328+41% | 232 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+41% | 7.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+41% | 58 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+41% | 232 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 432 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) — a 116.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+117% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile's 150W — a 80% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 312mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 150W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 312mm | 0mm |
| Height | 140mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 165.4+118% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile launched at $1130. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile costs 24.6% less ($369 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 22.0 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile offers 24.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $1130-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.7 | 22.0+24% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #43 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












