
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Radeon PRO W6800
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.

Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 20,702 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,702+2% | 20,270 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+20% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.62 TFLOPS | 17.82 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2320 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+500% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 60+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6800 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 carries 32 GB. Radeon PRO W6800 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6800. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 576 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 6+500% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+122% | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2249 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #83 | #74 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














