GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

2023Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1695 MHz
RTX family
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6800

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz
RX family
·······

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $579 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6800

2020

Why buy it

  • 8.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6.5% in PassMark G3D (22,056 vs 20,702), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, Radeon RX 6800 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6800

The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 20,702 versus the Radeon RX 6800's 22,056 — the Radeon RX 6800 leads by 6.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 60 (Radeon RX 6800) with 144 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 MobileRadeon RX 6800
G3D Mark Score
20,702
22,056+7%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4608+20%
3840
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.62 TFLOPS
16.17 TFLOPS+4%
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
2105 MHz+24%
ROPs
48
96+100%
TMUs
144
240+67%
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+500%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+700%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
36
60+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 MobileRadeon RX 6800
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800 carries 16 GB. Radeon RX 6800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 6800. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 MobileRadeon RX 6800
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
512 GB/s+100%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
32 MB+700%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 MobileRadeon RX 6800
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 MobileRadeon RX 6800
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCN 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 6800's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 MobileRadeon RX 6800
TDP
115W-54%
250W
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
Mobile
2x 8-pin
Length
0mm
240mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
180.0+104%
88.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 MobileRadeon RX 6800
MSRP
$579
Codename
AD106
Navi 21
Release
January 3 2023
October 28 2020
Ranking
#83
#65

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.