G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs RTX A5500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs RTX A5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).

RTX A5500

2022

Why buy it

✅21.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅122.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 144).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A5500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (21,108 vs 20,702), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RTX A5500 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A5500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, RTX A5500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs RTX A5500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.

RTX A5500

The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 20,702 and the RTX A5500 reaches 21,108 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 144 Tensor cores vs 320.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	RTX A5500
G3D Mark Score	20,702	21,108+2%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	5 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4608	10240+122%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.62 TFLOPS	34.1 TFLOPS+118%
Boost Clock	1695 MHz+2%	1665 MHz
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	144	320+122%
L1 Cache	4.5 MB	10 MB+122%
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	36	80+122%
Tensor Cores	144	320+122%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A5500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	RTX A5500
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 carries 24 GB. RTX A5500 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 200% advantage for the RTX A5500. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and 384-bit on the RTX A5500. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	RTX A5500
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	24 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	256 GB/s	768 GB/s+200%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	RTX A5500
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	RTX A5500
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	RTX A5500
TDP	115W-50%	230W
Recommended PSU	650W	450W-31%
Power Connector	Mobile	8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	180.0+96%	91.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (2023 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	RTX A5500
MSRP	—	$3600
Codename	AD106	GA102
Release	January 3 2023	March 22 2022
Ranking	#83	#67

Search GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on Amazon

Search RTX A5500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.