GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon PRO W7900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon PRO W7900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon PRO W7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 609% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 295W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌567.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌34.1% higher power demand at 295W vs 220W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon PRO W7900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 29,958 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 6.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 224 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,958+6% | 28,211 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168+17% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.48 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 224 | 384+71% |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB+133% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 96+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 carries 48 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 864 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 29.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-25% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 136.2+42% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER came in at $599, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER was 85% cheaper ($3400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 604.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-85% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+604% | 7.1 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #18 | #26 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and Radeon PRO W7900
