
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Radeon RX 7900 XT
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 32.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 276mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 20 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7900 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅66.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (20 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
- ❌12.7% longer card at 276mm vs 245mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7900 XT
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,996 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 29,958 and the Radeon RX 7900 XT reaches 28,996 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 5,376 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Raw compute: 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2394 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 84 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) with 224 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,958+3% | 28,996 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168+33% | 5376 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.48 TFLOPS | 51.48 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+3% | 2394 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 224 | 336+50% |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB+133% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 84+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7900 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT carries 20 GB. Radeon RX 7900 XT gives you 66.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 800 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — a 58.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and 320-bit on the Radeon RX 7900 XT. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 20 GB+67% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 800 GB/s+59% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 320-bit+67% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XT's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 276mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 276mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 136.2+41% | 96.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER came in at $599, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT launched at $899. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER was 33.4% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 32.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 54.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-33% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+55% | 32.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #18 | #21 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














