GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 167.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+167.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-167.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (310mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $800 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, it costs 81% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 99.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 167.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 264 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828+168% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448+230% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS+391% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+49% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 264+230% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB+232% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66+230% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 264+230% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+200% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 74.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 8-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 235mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 130W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 8-pin |
| Length | 310mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7+22% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 81.3% less ($650 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 99.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $249-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800 | $150-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8 | 79.3+99% |
| Codename | AD103 | GA106 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #10 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
