
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- β +438.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β470% higher power demand at 285W vs 50W.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 50W instead of 285W, a 235W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 31,578).
- βLess VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- β +438.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 50W instead of 285W, a 235W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β470% higher power demand at 285W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 31,578).
- βLess VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Intel Arc Pro A30M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Intel Arc Pro A30M

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 β the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 438.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+439% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+650% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+879% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+31% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+275% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+650% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A30M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A30M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) β the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W β a 140.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 50W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 117.2+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | β |
| Codename | AD104 | DG2-128 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #11 | #402 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












