
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅127.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 13% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌70.7% longer card at 285mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 285mm, a 118mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅127.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 13% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 285mm, a 118mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌70.7% longer card at 285mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 158.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+159% | 12,208 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+275% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+276% | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+275% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B50 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 121.1% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 70W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 174.4+57% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 56.3% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 12.9% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $349-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+13% | 35.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #11 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












