G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅12.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $8,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1770.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro GV100

2018

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
1026.3% HIGHER MSRP
$8,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Quadro GV100

2018

Why buy it

✅12.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $8,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1770.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
1026.3% HIGHER MSRP
$8,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Quadro GV100?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 12.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 19,013 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro GV100 is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 66.1% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $8,200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $8,999 MSRP, and you are getting 12.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 66.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1770.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro GV100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro GV100 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $8,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro GV100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	188 FPS	210 FPS
medium	171 FPS	185 FPS
high	155 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	188 FPS
medium	125 FPS	158 FPS
high	111 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	94 FPS
medium	79 FPS	80 FPS
high	66 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	47 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GV100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	664 FPS	385 FPS
medium	539 FPS	342 FPS
high	415 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	208 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	258 FPS
medium	400 FPS	224 FPS
high	329 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	128 FPS
medium	211 FPS	106 FPS
high	187 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	69 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GV100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	921 FPS	856 FPS
medium	742 FPS	684 FPS
high	652 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	428 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	642 FPS
medium	578 FPS	513 FPS
high	497 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	321 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	428 FPS
medium	403 FPS	342 FPS
high	352 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	214 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GV100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	879 FPS	318 FPS
medium	731 FPS	279 FPS
high	664 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	243 FPS
medium	585 FPS	219 FPS
high	514 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	148 FPS
medium	408 FPS	128 FPS
high	366 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	83 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GV100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro GV100

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro GV100

The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro GV100's 19,013 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 66.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro GV100 uses Volta, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5,120 (Quadro GV100). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1627 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
G3D Mark Score	31,578+66%	19,013
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Volta
Process Node	4 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	7680+50%	5120
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+141%	16.66 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+60%	1627 MHz
ROPs	80	128+60%
TMUs	240	320+33%
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	10 MB+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB
Tensor Cores	240	640+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro GV100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GV100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GV100 has 32 GB. The Quadro GV100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) — a 103.2% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6 MB (Quadro GV100) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	32 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	1024 GB/s+103%
Bus Width	192-bit	4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro GV100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro GV100's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The Quadro GV100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro GV100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GV100
TDP	285W	250W-12%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+46%	76.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Quadro GV100 launched at $8999. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 91.1% less ($8200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.1 (Quadro GV100) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1781% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).