G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅196.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌185% higher power demand at 285W vs 100W.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 285W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

2017

Why buy it

✅196.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 285W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌185% higher power demand at 285W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Quadro P4000 Max-Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 196.4% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 7,500 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P4000 Max-Q is a 2017 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 321.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 196.4% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 321.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P4000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P4000 Max-Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro P4000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low	188 FPS	82 FPS
medium	171 FPS	71 FPS
high	155 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	72 FPS
medium	125 FPS	63 FPS
high	111 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	26 FPS
medium	79 FPS	24 FPS
high	66 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P4000 Max-Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low	664 FPS	210 FPS
medium	539 FPS	180 FPS
high	415 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	160 FPS
medium	400 FPS	134 FPS
high	329 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	94 FPS
medium	211 FPS	77 FPS
high	187 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P4000 Max-Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low	921 FPS	338 FPS
medium	742 FPS	270 FPS
high	652 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	253 FPS
medium	578 FPS	202 FPS
high	497 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	127 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	169 FPS
medium	403 FPS	135 FPS
high	352 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P4000 Max-Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low	879 FPS	162 FPS
medium	731 FPS	133 FPS
high	664 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	118 FPS
medium	585 FPS	99 FPS
high	514 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	67 FPS
medium	408 FPS	54 FPS
high	366 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	32 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P4000 Max-Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro P4000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1114 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 7,500 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 321%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.401 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1228 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	31,578+321%	7,500
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	4 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	7680+329%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+811%	4.401 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+113%	1228 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240+114%	112
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+1036%	0.66 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 100W — a 96.1% difference. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P4000 Max-Q
TDP	285W	100W-65%
Recommended PSU	700W	350W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	110.8+48%	75.0