G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+148.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 676% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
212.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

✅+148.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 676% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
212.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Quadro P5000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 12,728 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P5000 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016, 148.1% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $1,700 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and you are getting 148.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 676%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P5000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro P5000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	188 FPS	252 FPS
medium	171 FPS	240 FPS
high	155 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	232 FPS
medium	125 FPS	195 FPS
high	111 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	135 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	128 FPS
medium	79 FPS	108 FPS
high	66 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	77 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P5000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	664 FPS	279 FPS
medium	539 FPS	235 FPS
high	415 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	140 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	179 FPS
medium	400 FPS	151 FPS
high	329 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	95 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	104 FPS
medium	211 FPS	85 FPS
high	187 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P5000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	921 FPS	573 FPS
medium	742 FPS	458 FPS
high	652 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	430 FPS
medium	578 FPS	344 FPS
high	497 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	286 FPS
medium	403 FPS	229 FPS
high	352 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	143 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P5000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	879 FPS	442 FPS
medium	731 FPS	373 FPS
high	664 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	260 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	356 FPS
medium	585 FPS	300 FPS
high	514 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	192 FPS
medium	408 FPS	151 FPS
high	366 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	111 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro P5000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro P5000

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro P5000

The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro P5000's 12,728 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 148.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
G3D Mark Score	31,578+148%	12,728
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	4 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	7680+275%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+352%	8.873 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+51%	1733 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240+50%	160
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+698%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+75%	288 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+30%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 45.2% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro P5000
TDP	285W	180W-37%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+57%	70.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 68% less ($1700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 674.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).