G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅408.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1800% higher power demand at 285W vs 15W.

Radeon 880M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 285W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon 880M

2024

Why buy it

✅408.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 285W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌1800% higher power demand at 285W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon 880M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 408.5% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 7,729 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon 880M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 308.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 408.5% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 308.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon 880M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 285W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 880M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?

Yes. Radeon 880M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 285W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti currently gives you 308.6% higher G3D Mark and 408.5% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon 880M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
1080p
low	188 FPS	46 FPS
medium	171 FPS	30 FPS
high	155 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	32 FPS
medium	125 FPS	19 FPS
high	111 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	12 FPS
medium	79 FPS	8 FPS
high	66 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 880M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
1080p
low	664 FPS	109 FPS
medium	539 FPS	76 FPS
high	415 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	78 FPS
medium	400 FPS	50 FPS
high	329 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	33 FPS
medium	211 FPS	24 FPS
high	187 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 880M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
1080p
low	921 FPS	310 FPS
medium	742 FPS	272 FPS
high	652 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	227 FPS
medium	578 FPS	205 FPS
high	497 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	135 FPS
medium	403 FPS	121 FPS
high	352 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 880M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
1080p
low	879 FPS	159 FPS
medium	731 FPS	125 FPS
high	664 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	82 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	112 FPS
medium	585 FPS	90 FPS
high	514 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	60 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	66 FPS
medium	408 FPS	53 FPS
high	366 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 880M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon 880M

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon 880M

The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon 880M's 7,729 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 308.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 880M uses RDNA 3.5, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon 880M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon 880M) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
G3D Mark Score	31,578+309%	7,729
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	4 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	7680+900%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+800%	4.454 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz	2900 MHz+11%
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+5669%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+400%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 880M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 880M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 880M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon 880M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	System
Bus Width	192-bit	System
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon 880M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.5
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.5
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon 880M's 15W — a 180% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 880M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 880M
TDP	285W	15W-95%
Recommended PSU	700W	350W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	110.8	515.3+365%