
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 555
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+905.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌280% higher power demand at 285W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 285W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,141 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅+905.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 285W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌280% higher power demand at 285W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,141 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon Pro 555?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 555 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon Pro 555

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon Pro 555's 3,141 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 905.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+905% | 3,141 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+900% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+2970% | 1.306 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+400% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+3847% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+4700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 555 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 555 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 555 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+4700% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 75W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+164% | 41.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 555 costs 100+% less ($799 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD104 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #11 | #574 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












