G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+145% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,891 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅+145% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,891 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 12,891 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 145.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of Unknown, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about 33.4% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $599 MSRP, and you are getting 145.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro Vega 64 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM, 12,891 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 64 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	188 FPS	106 FPS
medium	171 FPS	96 FPS
high	155 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	94 FPS
medium	125 FPS	81 FPS
high	111 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	47 FPS
medium	79 FPS	42 FPS
high	66 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	664 FPS	301 FPS
medium	539 FPS	262 FPS
high	415 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	204 FPS
medium	400 FPS	175 FPS
high	329 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	100 FPS
medium	211 FPS	84 FPS
high	187 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	921 FPS	580 FPS
medium	742 FPS	464 FPS
high	652 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	290 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	435 FPS
medium	578 FPS	348 FPS
high	497 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	290 FPS
medium	403 FPS	232 FPS
high	352 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	145 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	879 FPS	300 FPS
medium	731 FPS	247 FPS
high	664 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	220 FPS
medium	585 FPS	182 FPS
high	514 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	122 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	132 FPS
medium	408 FPS	118 FPS
high	366 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	79 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 64

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 12,891 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 145%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
G3D Mark Score	31,578+145%	12,891
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	7680+88%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+262%	11.06 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+93%	1350 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240	256+7%
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+650%	1 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	UVD 7.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
TDP	285W	250W-12%
Recommended PSU	700W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+115%	51.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 25% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 83.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).