
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅86.2% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1140.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌450.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅86.2% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1140.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌450.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega II Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 136 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 110 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 14,018 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 125.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses GCN 5.1, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+125% | 14,018 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+88% | 4096 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+185% | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+52% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 240 | 256 ×2+7% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+650% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 864 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.2 (2x). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 4.1 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 7.2 (2x) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 475W — a 50% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-40% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+276% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 81.8% less ($3600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1134.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-82% | $4399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+1134% | 3.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #11 | #170 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












