G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+16.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 263.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅3.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (27,180 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
212.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅+16.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 263.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅3.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (27,180 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
212.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7800?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 16.2% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 16.2% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $1,700 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 16.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 263.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7800 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	188 FPS	225 FPS
medium	171 FPS	210 FPS
high	155 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	203 FPS
medium	125 FPS	171 FPS
high	111 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	138 FPS
medium	79 FPS	115 FPS
high	66 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	664 FPS	619 FPS
medium	539 FPS	508 FPS
high	415 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	329 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	450 FPS
medium	400 FPS	371 FPS
high	329 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	246 FPS
medium	211 FPS	206 FPS
high	187 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	151 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	921 FPS	918 FPS
medium	742 FPS	762 FPS
high	652 FPS	676 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	709 FPS
medium	578 FPS	583 FPS
high	497 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	497 FPS
medium	403 FPS	411 FPS
high	352 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	291 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	879 FPS	881 FPS
medium	731 FPS	732 FPS
high	664 FPS	671 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	583 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	692 FPS
medium	585 FPS	577 FPS
high	514 FPS	512 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	445 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	472 FPS
medium	408 FPS	405 FPS
high	366 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	306 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W7800

The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 16.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
G3D Mark Score	31,578+16%	27,180
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	7680+71%	4480
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS	45.25 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+3%	2525 MHz
ROPs	80	128+60%
TMUs	240	280+17%
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+275%	2 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60	70+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	32 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	576 GB/s+14%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 9.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7800
TDP	285W	260W-9%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+6%	104.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 68% less ($1700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 262.4% better value.