G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+236.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 173.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% longer card at 285mm vs 195mm.

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Measures 195mm instead of 285mm, a 90mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,382 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅+236.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 173.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Measures 195mm instead of 285mm, a 90mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% longer card at 285mm vs 195mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,382 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon R9 Fury X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 9,382 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R9 Fury X is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 236.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about 23.1% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting 236.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 Fury X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 Fury X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 Fury X is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 9,382 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Fury X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	188 FPS	117 FPS
medium	171 FPS	104 FPS
high	155 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	53 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	98 FPS
medium	125 FPS	86 FPS
high	111 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	39 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	34 FPS
medium	79 FPS	31 FPS
high	66 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon R9 Fury X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	664 FPS	261 FPS
medium	539 FPS	219 FPS
high	415 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	186 FPS
medium	400 FPS	151 FPS
high	329 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	101 FPS
medium	211 FPS	81 FPS
high	187 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon R9 Fury X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	921 FPS	422 FPS
medium	742 FPS	338 FPS
high	652 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	211 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	317 FPS
medium	578 FPS	253 FPS
high	497 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	211 FPS
medium	403 FPS	169 FPS
high	352 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	106 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon R9 Fury X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	879 FPS	197 FPS
medium	731 FPS	164 FPS
high	664 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	117 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	137 FPS
medium	585 FPS	118 FPS
high	514 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	82 FPS
medium	408 FPS	68 FPS
high	366 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon R9 Fury X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon R9 Fury X

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 9,382 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 236.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score	31,578+237%	9,382
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	7680+88%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+366%	8.602 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+149%	1050 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240	256+7%
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+650%	1 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 Fury X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 1.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	512 GB/s+2%
Bus Width	192-bit	4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	UVD 6.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 3.6% difference. The Radeon R9 Fury X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon R9 Fury X
TDP	285W	275W-4%
Recommended PSU	700W	600W-14%
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	285mm	195mm
Height	112mm	115mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	60°C-14%
Perf/Watt	110.8+225%	34.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. The Radeon R9 Fury X costs 18.8% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 172.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).