
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+142.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 21.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌256.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 80W.
- ❌28400% longer card at 285mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 285W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 285mm, a 284mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,016 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅+142.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 21.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 285W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 285mm, a 284mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌256.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 80W.
- ❌28400% longer card at 285mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,016 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 6600S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6600S still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 112 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 6600S

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 13,016 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 142.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600S) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+143% | 13,016 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+329% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+459% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+31% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+114% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6600S relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600S has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600S) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600S) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 112.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6600S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 285mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 80W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 285mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 162.7+47% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600S launched at $400. The Radeon RX 6600S costs 49.9% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 32.5 (Radeon RX 6600S) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 21.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $400-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+22% | 32.5 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #11 | #200 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












