G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+344.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1800% higher power demand at 285W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 285W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅+344.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 285W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌1800% higher power demand at 285W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RadeonT 780M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 7,098 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while RadeonT 780M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 344.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 344.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RadeonT 780M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 285W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?

Yes. RadeonT 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 285W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti currently gives you 344.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

RadeonT 780M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	188 FPS	93 FPS
medium	171 FPS	78 FPS
high	155 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	80 FPS
medium	125 FPS	68 FPS
high	111 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	29 FPS
medium	79 FPS	27 FPS
high	66 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RadeonT 780M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	664 FPS	98 FPS
medium	539 FPS	68 FPS
high	415 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	33 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	67 FPS
medium	400 FPS	45 FPS
high	329 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	35 FPS
medium	211 FPS	25 FPS
high	187 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RadeonT 780M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	921 FPS	319 FPS
medium	742 FPS	256 FPS
high	652 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	160 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	240 FPS
medium	578 FPS	192 FPS
high	497 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	159 FPS
medium	403 FPS	128 FPS
high	352 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	77 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RadeonT 780M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	879 FPS	214 FPS
medium	731 FPS	171 FPS
high	664 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	142 FPS
medium	585 FPS	117 FPS
high	514 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	83 FPS
medium	408 FPS	67 FPS
high	366 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RadeonT 780M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RadeonT 780M

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 344.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	31,578+345%	7,098
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	7680+900%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+350%	8.909 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz	2900 MHz+11%
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+2900%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+400%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 180% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.