
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+25.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 844.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5880 Ada Generation across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅8.1% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅83.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (25,096 vs 31,578).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌650.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅+25.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 844.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅8.1% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅83.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5880 Ada Generation across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (25,096 vs 31,578).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌650.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX 5880 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 5880 Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 915 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 5880 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,096 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 25,096 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 25.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 14,080 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 69.27 TFLOPS (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 110 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) with 240 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+26% | 25,096 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 14080+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS | 69.27 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+6% | 2460 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 176+120% |
| TMUs | 240 | 440+83% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 13.8 MB+84% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 110+83% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 440+83% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5880 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 72 MB (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 768 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 285W — a 0% difference. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+26% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation launched at $6000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 86.7% less ($5201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.2 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 840.5% better value. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-87% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+840% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 5 2024 |
| Ranking | #11 | #40 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












