
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,850 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 705.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌23.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 230W.
RTX A6000
2021Why buy it
- ✅6.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 285W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌481.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX A6000
2021Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,850 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 705.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅6.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 285W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌23.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 230W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌481.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX A6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 257 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX A6000

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX A6000
RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX A6000's 22,815 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 38.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 64 (RTX A6000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+38% | 22,815 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 8192+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+44% | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+54% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 240 | 256+7% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 8 MB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 64+7% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 256+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The RTX A6000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A6000) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX A6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6 MB (RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 768 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 21.4% difference. The RTX A6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 230W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+12% | 99.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 82.8% less ($3850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.9 (RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 706.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-83% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+706% | 4.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #11 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












