
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+151.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 529.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,558 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅+151.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 529.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,558 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Tesla T10?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T10 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Tesla T10

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Tesla T10's 12,558 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 151.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+151% | 12,558 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+67% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+179% | 14.38 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla T10 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T10 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T10 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 9.2% difference. The Tesla T10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 260W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+129% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 60.1% less ($1201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 527% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-60% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+527% | 6.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #11 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












