
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 55.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+55.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-55.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (310mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $800 for the GeForce RTX 4080, it costs 75% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 157.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+157.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 scores 34,445 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 55.4%. The GeForce RTX 4080 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 304 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34,445+55% | 22,172 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728+65% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS+140% | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz+45% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 304+65% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB+64% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+1500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76+65% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 304+65% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4080 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 64.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 4080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 736 GB/s+64% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+1500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 draws 320W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 37% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 242mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W | 220W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 310mm | 242mm |
| Height | 140mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 107.6+7% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 75% less ($600 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.1 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 157.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4080 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $499-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800 | $200-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.1 | 110.9+157% |
| Codename | AD103 | GA104 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #7 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














