GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (310mm) | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $800 (vs $800), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 8.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 scores 34,445 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 8.2%. The GeForce RTX 4080 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 304 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34,445+8% | 31,828 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728+15% | 8448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS+11% | 44.1 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz | 2610 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 304+15% | 264 |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB+14% | 8.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76+15% | 66 |
| Tensor Cores | 304+15% | 264 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6X. Memory bandwidth: 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 9.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 736 GB/s+10% | 672 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 draws 320W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 11.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 310mm vs 310mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W | 285W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 310mm | 310mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-3% | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 107.6 | 111.7+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 and now averages $800. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.1 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4080 offers 8.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $799-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800 | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.1+8% | 39.8 |
| Codename | AD103 | AD103 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #7 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
