GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 5050
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5050
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-29.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+29.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $249 for the GeForce RTX 5050, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 61.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 5050
The GeForce RTX 5050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 24 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2317 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,087 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5050 scores 17,087 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 29.8%. The GeForce RTX 5050 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 13.17 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 80 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,087 | 22,172+30% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5888+130% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.17 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+54% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+49% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 184+130% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 5.8 MB+132% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 46+130% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 184+130% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 5050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5050) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5050 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 51.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 5050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-41% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 131.4+30% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5050 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 19.7% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.6 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 61.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 5050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $200-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.6 | 110.9+62% |
| Codename | GB207 | GA104 |
| Release | June 24 2025 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #112 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 3070
