
GeForce RTX 5050

Radeon RX 6650M XT
GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon RX 6650M XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon RX 6650M XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon RX 6650M XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 5050
2025Why buy it
- ✅0.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.6 vs 42.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 6650M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌GeForce RTX 5050 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌60.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 68.6 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon RX 6650M XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 5050
The GeForce RTX 5050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 24 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2317 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,087 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 6650M XT
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,071 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5050 scores 17,087 and the Radeon RX 6650M XT reaches 17,071 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5050 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6650M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Raw compute: 13.17 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 9.896 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 32 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,087 | 17,071 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.17 TFLOPS+33% | 9.896 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+6% | 2416 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 5050 uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6650M XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 5050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6650M XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5050. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 5050 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6650M XT. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the GeForce RTX 5050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+25% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5050) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6650M XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5050 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6650M XT's 120W — a 8% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 120W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 131.4 | 142.3+8% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 5050 came in at $249, while the Radeon RX 6650M XT launched at $400. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 5050 was 37.8% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 68.6 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 42.7 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the GeForce RTX 5050 offers 60.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5050 (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.6+61% | 42.7 |
| Codename | GB207 | Navi 23 |
| Release | June 24 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #112 | #113 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














