GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 5050

2025Core: 2317 MHzBoost: 2572 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2150 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon Pro W6900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon Pro W6900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 5050

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2264.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.6 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021

Why buy it

  • 41.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • GeForce RTX 5050 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 2309.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 68.6 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
  • 10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro W6900X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (17,413 vs 17,087), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 5050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 5050 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,751 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $6,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2264.5% (68.6 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro W6900X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 5050

The GeForce RTX 5050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 24 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2317 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,087 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon Pro W6900X

The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 5050 scores 17,087 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5050 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 13.17 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X) with 80 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 5050Radeon Pro W6900X
G3D Mark Score
17,087
17,413+2%
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2560
5120+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
13.17 TFLOPS
22.02 TFLOPS+67%
Boost Clock
2572 MHz+20%
2150 MHz
ROPs
32
128+300%
TMUs
80
320+300%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+150%
1 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+500%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
20
80+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 5050 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W6900X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 5050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W6900X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 5050Radeon Pro W6900X
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 4 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 4)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 5050 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X carries 32 GB. Radeon Pro W6900X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 5050 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W6900X. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce RTX 5050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 5050Radeon Pro W6900X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+500%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce RTX 5050Radeon Pro W6900X
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5050) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).

FeatureGeForce RTX 5050Radeon Pro W6900X
Encoder
9th Gen NVENC
VCN 3.0
Decoder
6th Gen NVDEC
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5050 draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 5050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 5050Radeon Pro W6900X
TDP
130W-57%
300W
Recommended PSU
450W-31%
650W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
267mm
Height
111mm
120mm
Slots
2-50%
4
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
131.4+127%
58.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 5050 came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 5050 was 95.9% cheaper ($5751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 68.6 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce RTX 5050 offers 2265.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5050 (2025 vs 2021).

FeatureGeForce RTX 5050Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP
$249-96%
$6000
Performance per Dollar
68.6+2266%
2.9
Codename
GB207
Navi 21
Release
June 24 2025
August 3 2021
Ranking
#112
#101

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.