
GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

GeForce RTX 5050
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5050
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 5050 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The GeForce RTX 5050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (270mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $249 versus $350 for the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, it costs 29% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 45% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($249) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5050 and Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

GeForce RTX 5050
The GeForce RTX 5050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 24 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2317 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,087 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1680 MHz to 1980 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,562 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5050 scores 17,087 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary reaches 16,562 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5050 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary). Raw compute: 13.17 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 10.14 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 1980 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,087+3% | 16,562 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.17 TFLOPS+30% | 10.14 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+30% | 1980 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) — a 40% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) — the GeForce RTX 5050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5050) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5050 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 5050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 650W (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 270mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 131.4+79% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5050 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary launched at $499 and now averages $350. The GeForce RTX 5050 costs 28.9% less ($101 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.6 (GeForce RTX 5050) vs 47.3 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) — the GeForce RTX 5050 offers 45% better value. The GeForce RTX 5050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249-29% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.6+45% | 47.3 |
| Codename | GB207 | Navi 10 |
| Release | June 24 2025 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #112 | #120 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














