GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $429 versus $999 for the Radeon PRO W7700, it costs 57% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 129.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+129.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($429) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,770 points. Launch price was $429.
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB scores 22,770 and the Radeon PRO W7700 reaches 23,062 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,770 | 23,062+1% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+50% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz | 2600 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+500% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 48+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 5.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-5% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C-15% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+4% | 121.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $429, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 and now averages $999. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB costs 57.1% less ($570 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers 129.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-57% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $429-57% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+130% | 23.1 |
| Codename | GB206 | Navi 32 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | November 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #55 | #52 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and Radeon PRO W7700
