
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7700 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (16 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7700 XT.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $429 for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, it costs 11% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 12.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($429) | ✅More affordable ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and Radeon RX 7700 XT

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,770 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon RX 7700 XT
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 25 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1435 MHz to 2544 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,654 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB scores 22,770 and the Radeon RX 7700 XT reaches 22,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7700 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 3,456 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 35.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2544 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 54 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,770 | 22,654 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+33% | 3456 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 35.17 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+1% | 2544 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 216+50% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+500% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 54+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7700 XT's 245W — a 30.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 700W (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-27% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C | 55°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+37% | 92.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $429, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT launched at $449 and now averages $380. The Radeon RX 7700 XT costs 11.4% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 59.6 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the Radeon RX 7700 XT offers 12.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-4% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $429 | $380-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1 | 59.6+12% |
| Codename | GB206 | Navi 32 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | August 25 2023 |
| Ranking | #55 | #58 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















