GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB vs Radeon RX 7900M
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 7900M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and Radeon RX 7900M
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,599 points. Launch price was $379.
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB scores 22,599 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,599 | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+23% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 144 | 288+100% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+50% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 72+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC 6th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 330W-45% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.5 | 124.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $379 | — |
| Codename | GB206 | Navi 31 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | October 19 2023 |
| Ranking | #60 | #62 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and Radeon RX 7900M
