GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs Quadro RTX A6000
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX A6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (247mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $379 versus $3,500 for the Quadro RTX A6000, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 828.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+828.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($379) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and Quadro RTX A6000
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,918 points. Launch price was $379.
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti scores 22,918 and the Quadro RTX A6000 reaches 22,798 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 144 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,918 | 22,798 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 10752+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+43% | 1800 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 144 | 336+133% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 10.5 MB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 84+133% |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 336+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti draws 180W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 247mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-40% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 247mm | 267mm |
| Height | 135mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 127.3+68% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $379, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 and now averages $3500. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti costs 89.2% less ($3121 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.5 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 6.5 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti offers 830.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-92% | $4649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $379-89% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.5+831% | 6.5 |
| Codename | GB206 | GA102 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #57 | #54 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and Quadro RTX A6000
