
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
2025Why buy it
- ✅48.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,620 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 60.5 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 144).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌427.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 60.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,918 points. Launch price was $379.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti scores 22,918 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 144 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,918 | 24,046+5% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 6144+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+65% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 6 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 48+33% |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 192+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 24.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+24% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti draws 180W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 247mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 247mm | 267mm |
| Height | 135mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 127.3 | 343.5+170% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti came in at $379, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 5060 Ti was 81% cheaper ($1620 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 60.5 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti offers 404.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-81% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.5+404% | 12.0 |
| Codename | GB206 | AD104 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #57 | #47 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














