
GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 5060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 5060 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The GeForce RTX 5060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 164.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+164.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-164.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $299 for the GeForce RTX 5060, it costs 75% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 50.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+50.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 5060
The GeForce RTX 5060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2497 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,836 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5060 scores 20,836 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce RTX 5060 leads by 164.8%. The GeForce RTX 5060 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 19.18 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2497 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,836+165% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+329% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.18 TFLOPS+543% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2497 MHz+50% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+114% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3.8 MB+332% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce RTX 5060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+250% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 6th gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 draws 145W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 63.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 145W | 75W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 143.7+37% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 74.9% less ($224 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.7 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 50.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $149-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $75-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.7 | 104.9+51% |
| Codename | GB206 | TU117 |
| Release | May 19 2025 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #69 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.










